Comments on: A Cleaner, Gentler Homophobia!

By: michael

michael — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:41:10 +0000

your post is a good read and very funny. it makes you think like y in the history books they leave out that in most all of the so call great civilizations like ,Greeks, Japanese, Romans oh well just about all it was OK to have both male and female partners in life for both sexes it was no big deal. but when religion needed more followers it became a bad thing because it did not make a profit and if you don’t have people making babies and feeling guilt for bad thoughts how can you make money which is the true GOD of GODS is it not :]

By: Saint Gasoline

Saint Gasoline — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:49:40 +0000

No, the profanity is not necessary, Charlie, but I find it enjoyable and it adequately expresses my hatred of such bigotry much more than calling them “poopheads”. A nice, fine “cockmonkey” is so much more satisfying. However, my language use doesn’t reflect on my maturity, so I have to disagree with you on that point. What reflects on my maturity is my refusal to wear pants in public and my constant giggling and screaming of “weiners!” whenever I pass by a hot dog stand while soiling myself and flinging my poo.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:33:42 +0000

Is all of that profanity necessary? How immature of you.

Regarding your take on Evolution and Homosexuality. Bring it on. They will breed themselves out of existence.

By: Saint Gasoline

Saint Gasoline — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:29:52 +0000

Thanks for the comments, everyone. I’ll try to keep writing more, but it is really difficult because I’m a perfectionist and never feel like anything is worth posting unless it is absolutely glorious (although you wouldn’t know that from the usual drivel I end up posting after giving up on perfection, ha).

By: Jennifer Lewis

Jennifer Lewis — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:49:01 +0000

All right, not very nuanced… but funny as hell and the sentiments are shared here. The semantics angle they use is as you say plain bullshit, meant to deflect from what the vileness of what they’re doing; and you really do call everything for what it is. If they had balls, they’d just come out and be blunt about it.

(Like you need me to reaffirm that. So why am I posting this? Cuz you make me laugh, and that doesn’t happen much, and I’ve been shafted by their brand of inanity enough that it’s either post this or firebomb most of Colorado Springs… and I don’t have enough money for a plane ticket and I still need to eat dinner, and my toes are cold, dammit, so… yeah.)

By: Mathew Wilder

Mathew Wilder — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:31:28 +0000

Great to have you back writing, SG. I’d missed your deliciously angry and profanity-laced rants. Mine aren’t nearly so eloquent!

By: Jeff Satterley

Jeff Satterley — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:44:37 +0000

Ahhh.. glad SG writings are back. It’s been a while

By: Gailmom

Gailmom — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:29:04 +0000

I agree with you, 100%. But the reasons I’m bothering to comment is so much less mature than that.

“brain-dead cock monkeys”!! Bwahahahahahaha

You rock, man. Truly. I could go to lots of places to hear my opinions repeated and expanded, full of righteous wrath, but I’d so much rather read it here, where immature moments of amusement help make it palatable. (This reasoning is probably also why I get all my news from Jon Stewart).

Thank you so much. Please keep doing what you do.

By: sometimes

sometimes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:14:35 +0000

you are too right. that was very well argued, i especially liked the potential pig-fucking society.

By: HanaLena

HanaLena — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:24:32 +0000

Random Share for the Day =

http://xkcd.com/154/