Best Typo Ever
June 24th, 2009While I was proofreading a book at work today, I noticed what is perhaps the funniest typo in the history of publishing. This section of the book was discussing the Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator. Unfortunately, a fateful typographical error changed the tone of the discussion immensely. You see, instead of discussing the Large Hadron Collider, this book had inadvertently been discussing the Large Hardon Collider. The former obviously collides protons to help uncover the existence of fundamental theoretical particles. The Large Hardon Collider, on the other hand, is some other experiment, one that probably is not suitable for the eyes of young children. Where such an experiment would find willing test subjects is beyond me, as the last thing I would do with my hardon is send it shuttling toward another hardon in a high speed collision.
And what is the purpose of this Large Hardon Collider, anyway? Are they searching for the Higgs bosom?
EDIT: After a commenter directed me to the Large HardOn Collider’s official website, I felt as if I had to send the webmaster an email of apology. Here is what I sent him:
Dear HardOn scientists,
Your large hardon experiments sound interesting. I was not aware this was a real experiment. You see, at work the other day, I was proofreading a textbook and corrected what I thought to be a typographical error, changing “Large Hardon Collider” to “Large Hadron Collider”. Now I am worried that, perhaps, the author was referring to your hardon experiments. Should I be worried? Are a lot of college textbook writers taking interest in your hardons? I am terrified that I will be fired as a proofreader as a result of this egregious error, and changing the spelling to Hadron when I should have queried the author if he really was talking about colliding hardons.
Also, sorry for making that correction, as now your tally of hardons will come up short. And as we all know, when a hardon comes up short, that’s always a bad thing.
I’ve also uncovered, after a bit of research, how this Large Hardon Collider probably works. The Large Hadron Collider, for instance, works by removing electrons from hydrogen atoms, leaving only protons, and then accelerating these protons around a ring by using oppositely charged magnets synchronized to turn on and off as the particles whoosh by. In a similar manner, the Large Hardon Collider must start with penises in vaginas. It then bombards these penis-vagina connections with baseball statistics to cause them to disengage. At this point, with the penis free, the hardons are set into motion by repelling them with pictures of my naked grandmother, which universally repels large hardons. Once in motion, more and more pictures of naked grandmas, becoming progressively more crusty and aged, are shown to these hardons, causing them to move faster and faster. Once the hardons are moving at 99.9% the speed of light (at which point time slows down for the hardons to such a degree that a single ejaculation would take 200,000 years from the relative perspective of those of us watching from Earth), they are suddenly sent hurtling toward other large hardons, with the collision producing conditions that likely held less than a second after the Big Ejaculation that created our universe. It is at this point that the Higgs bosom could manifest itself.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.




June 24th, 2009 at 10:22 PM
This stupid “typo” has been made millions of times. People have done it intentionally, and it’s very, very old. While it may have been a typo in this book, everyone else has already thought of it, laughed, and moved on.
June 24th, 2009 at 10:29 PM
I assure you that a college textbook did not intentionally make this typo.
And is this old? Shit, I guess I should stop making posts about atheism, why alternative medicine is bunk, and using the word “fail,” because all of this is old and has much precedent on the Internet as well. After all, if anything has ever been mentioned before, God forbid you mention it AGAIN. Why, I bet this typo has been made so many times that people like yourself have written countless comments with original, witty remarks like “Fail” to those who have documented this typo! In fact, so many people have probably commented on such failing that to even comment on the failing is now a form of fail. And a second-hand fail is the worst of all.
And also, get out of my comments if you’re going to be a trendy e-douchebag scouring the Internet for anything you can reply to with “FAIL” or “FIRST” or with a cat macro. Such people piss me off worse than creationists.
Oh, and by the way, I believe this is what the kids would call pwnage, correct? Yes, pure pwnage.
June 24th, 2009 at 11:33 PM
I still kind of giggle when I make that mistake typing up my PhD work.
June 25th, 2009 at 10:04 AM
It would be tempting to say Fail fails at failing, but that too would be a major fail. So pwnd is adequate.
This is the first time I’ve seen it, and I almost died and fell off my chair, and that was before I read Higgs Bosom. Thanks!
June 25th, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Dude, GoogleAds is showing these ads on your website, i’m guessing you might want to do something about it:
http://www.gnmagazine.org/evolution/?S=2&gclid=CP7L_Z6NppsCFQydnAodiSFEBg
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/blog/atheists-riddle/
The last one, is from a guy named Perry Marshall who claims “To The Extent Science Can Prove Anything, Information Theory PROVES that DNA Was Designed.”
Couldn’t find an e-mail addy to write to you directly, so I posted this as a comment.
June 25th, 2009 at 4:24 PM
http://largehardoncollider.com/ explains how the penile accelerator works
June 25th, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Thanks for the link, Mars. I’ve had to edit this post to give credit to such a wonderful experiment on Hardons.
June 25th, 2009 at 10:40 PM
So as soon as you saw this typo, you immediately lepton it because it meshed with one of your personality quarks.
Hmph. What a muon!