Comments on: Illogical Answers in Genesis (Introduction)

By: Liew

Liew — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:03:08 +0000

‘But the biography page continues by saying, “Creationist thinking in these areas is still very preliminary.” If by “preliminary” you mean outlandish, idiotic, totally incompatible with the evidence, and bordering on insane, then I agree.’

What do you mean “bordering” on insane?

By: Flavin

Flavin — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:38:34 +0000

It’s his talent.

Shame we never got him to a Skeptics in the Pub before he moved away.

By: Saint Gasoline

Saint Gasoline — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:34:33 +0000

Well shit. I don’t know if I can top Bing’s treatment there! He basically molested him with words.

By: Flavin

Flavin — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:24:28 +0000

Bing at HJHoP also posted about this. Read it.
http://hjhop.blogspot.com/2009/09/i-dont-want-to-use-phrase-fucked.html

By: ziztur

ziztur — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:51:57 +0000

Oh yeah, here’s my take on Lisle’s “stuff”.

http://www.ziztur.com/2009/08/fallacious-reification.html
http://www.ziztur.com/2009/08/fallacious-question-begging-epithet.html

Shameless plug for me!

By: ziztur

ziztur — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:48:34 +0000

Hahahaha – I went through a few of Lisle’s “fallacies” on my blog too. My favorite is the “question-begging epithet” which isn’t a fallacy, but by his “definition” he actually commits it several times in the same post about it. Whee!

By: Ben

Ben — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:23 +0000

C’mon now, tell us what you *really* think.

“If by ‘preliminary’ you mean outlandish, idiotic, totally incompatible with the evidence, and bordering on insane, then I agree.”

hehe